The federal Liberals are still in negotiations to get the World Health Organization-led Pandemic Agreement finalized, documents reveal.

Health Canada says Pandemic Agreement “still under development”

“The Pandemic Agreement is still under development,” they stated in their response to an order paper question submitted by Conservative MP, Leslyn Lewis.

The response came from The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). The department further indicated that, if required, they’re willing to change domestic laws. 

“As negotiations progress, the Government of Canada will continue to carefully consider its potential impact on our existing domestic laws, policies, and practices and if there is a need to make changes at the domestic level to implement our international obligations.”

This comes five months after countries failed to come to an agreement on the WHO’s international pandemic treaty by a “deadline”; however, WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus said he wasn’t giving up.

While there was a lot of push for the pandemic treaty toward the end of the lockdowns, many member states of the World Health Assembly refused to sign on, citing issues such as a lack of equity in terms of medical supply access and possible threats to national sovereignty.

Specifically, the original draft of the treaty would allow the WHO to dictate health policy around the world any time a pandemic was declared, including mandating lockdowns, and decide when said pandemic was declared.

Legally-binding

The legally binding nature of the pandemic treaty was a key point of contention, which the WHO reluctantly had to remove from the pact as they became increasingly desperate to have it passed.

In fact, the UK refused to sign on for just that reason.

“Unless the current text is changed and refined, we will not be signing up,” said UK Health Minister Andrew Stephenson.

He added that Britain would only support the treaty if it is “firmly in the United Kingdom’s national interest” and respects national sovereignty.

“Under no circumstances will we allow the WHO to have the power to mandate lockdowns; this would be unthinkable and has never been proposed. Protecting our sovereignty is a British red line,” Stephenson said.

Share this story

Donate now to keep us on the front lines:

Help Keep your News Free

It's crucial we stay in touch

Big Tech wants to censor us, that’s why you need to stay in touch.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE THESE...

Trending News

Trudeau Government-funded Egale Canada files court injunction against Smith’s trans legislation, says it will harm 10-year-olds who need puberty blockers.

Mike Campbell

December 10, 2024

Trending News

Jagmeet Singh protects Trudeau again, votes against a non-confidence motion that strictly consisted of things he’s said about the Prime Minister.

TCS Wire

December 9, 2024

Trending News

Conservative students at U of W condemn no-Whites allowed safe space.

Mike Campbell

December 9, 2024

Trending News

CTV writes puff piece for “Jihadi Jack.”

Walid Tamtam

December 6, 2024

Trending News

Disgruntled Ottawa residents expressing concerns about refugees straining city resources are being criticized by city councillors for allowing “fear (to) get in the way of compassion.”

Mike Campbell

December 5, 2024

Trending News

The JCCF has launched a challenge in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia against recent modifications to the province’s medical privacy laws.

Mike Campbell

December 4, 2024

Want to join the conversation?

Sign up now to be able to like, comment and reply to other members. A full membership to our site includes:

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.