Study suggests natural immunity is better than vaccination

Study suggests natural immunity is superior to vaccination

A new peer-reviewed study suggests the natural immunity of an unvaccinated person offers more robust protection against re-infection than those who received the vaccine before being infected — and offers about the same level of protection as those with ‘hybrid’ immunity.

Study suggests natural immunity is superior to vaccination
Study suggests natural immunity is superior to vaccination

Accounting for more than 5.7 million people in their study, researchers Goldberg, Yair, et al. concluded in The New England Journal of Medicine that:

“…Protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons.” [Emphasis added]

The researchers compared infection rates among three groups: (1) previously infected, unvaccinated; (2) previously infected, vaccinated, and (3) vaccinated persons with no previous infection. This allowed them to “assess the level of protection afforded by hybrid immunity as compared with that afforded by natural immunity or immunity conferred by vaccination.” 

The infection rate for the recovered, unvaccinated group – at 4 to 6 months after infection – is 10.5 per 100,000, which rises to 30.2 at 12 months.

Conversely, the infection rate for the uninfected, vaccinated group – from 4 to 6 months after vaccination – is 69 per 100,000. This is more than twice as high as the infection rate from group 1 in half the time.

Also, the ‘hybrid immunity’ group – meaning recovered and vaccinated – produced similar results as the unvaccinated, recovered group. Indeed, the difference is negligible at 4-6 months and 6-8 months post-infection.  

In other words, the so-called ‘hybrid protection,’ which experts said for months was ‘the best’ type of protection, looks no different than protection from natural immunity for unvaccinated persons.

With that said, waning immunity was found in all three cohorts.

This study verifies another previously covered by The Counter Signal that found that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines offer no long-term protection against COVID-19, particularly with the Omicron variant.

And to this point, Canada’s recent data dump reveals the boosted account for the majority of COVID deaths.

Share this story

Donate now to keep us on the front lines:

Help Keep your News Free

It's crucial we stay in touch

Big Tech wants to censor us, that’s why you need to stay in touch.

[wpp limit=6 order_by='views']

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE THESE...

Trending News

Donald Trump goes after gender ideology in his second speech since narrowly surviving an assassination attempt.

TCS Wire

July 20, 2024

Trending News

Von der Leyen just got re-elected — and chastised in parliament.

Mike Campbell

July 18, 2024

Trending News

Pfizer sued by Kansas Attorney General: “Pfizer made multiple misleading statements to deceive the public about its vaccine…”

Mike Campbell

June 28, 2024

Trending News

FAUCI: “If trying to save people’s lives is a crime, then I am guilty.”

Alexa Posa

June 25, 2024

Trending News

The federally-funded Toronto Star, which once wrote “let them die” referring to unvaccinated people, published an article claiming Canadians haven’t lost any freedom.

Alexa Posa

June 21, 2024

Trending News

The coercion and broken promises of COVID vaccines has consequences.

Mike Campbell

June 12, 2024

Want to join the conversation?

Sign up now to be able to like, comment and reply to other members. A full membership to our site includes:

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.