The WHO is urging countries to finalize the terms of the global Pandemic Treaty—due May 27. Member states resume negotiations on April 29.

The purpose of the Pandemic Treaty, as stated by the WHO, is to provide safety to the world during health emergencies such as pandemics. It would allow the WHO to determine when to impose legally binding health restrictions like global vaccine mandates and lockdowns.

Here are the top 5 concerns of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty:

1. Loss of sovereignty 

There’s debate over whether the WHO would merely be custodians of the Pandemic Treaty, or whether the WHO would ultimately be rulers behind enforcing “legally binding” health directives to member states.

Those concerned over losing sovereignty are slandered as conspiratorial and their claims are “wholly false,” according to the WHO’s director, but the Pandemic Treaty holds no weight if a member country’s abstention from its policies is inconsequential.  

To this end, the Pandemic Treaty could determine what legally binding measures Canada must put in place during pandemics, including vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, and lockdowns.

WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus has previously denied that a Pandemic Treaty would force countries to comply with its regulations, but he’s also threatened sanctions for countries that don’t do so.

Meanwhile, the World Economic Forum, another unelected global entity that encourages the Pandemic Treaty, has stated that it’s “not yet clear what happens if the measures are not followed.”

WHO member states, including Canada, are currently negotiating the Pandemic Treaty with the WHO in an attempt to maintain sovereignty while also being a team player during pandemics. 

As reported by the Globe and Mail, member states are sending back clauses in the latest round of negotiations that intentionally obfuscate when the Treaty would apply and when a country can make its own health-related decisions that are contrary to the WHO’s directives.

2. Big Pharma / Funders Conflict

Just how much influence Big Pharma has over the WHO remains unclear — but it’s one of the biggest concerns from those who are weary of a Pandemic Treaty.

Some health professionals like American Dr. Peter McCullough, a world renowned cardiologist with over 70,000 citations in peer reviewed articles, have sounded alarm bells over the influence Big Pharma has over the same medical journals that the WHO leverages when making announcements.

Last year, one of McCullough’s academic papers was retracted by the journal’s editors within mere hours of publication, because, according to the editors, “the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

McCullough et al. had concluded in their study that the COVID vaccine caused the majority of deaths that occurred post-inoculation.

“The methodology was blue chip – approved by Dr. Peter McCullough personally who has a huge experience with academic standards for publication,” the study’s co-author, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, later told The Counter Signal. 

“Open the pages of any medical journal and you will see it dominated by pharmaceutical advertisements,” he also noted.

Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico recently echoed Hodkinson’s assertion, calling the WHO a Big Pharma creation that seeks to control governments. Fico didn’t provide evidence for his claims, though.

Big Pharma did donate $36 million to the WHO in 2020, but this was less than 1% of the WHO’s voluntary contributions that year. 

However, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was the WHO’s largest voluntary contributor in 2020, donating $751 million. 

Bill Gates has called the mRNA COVID vaccines the “greatest medical breakthrough” of the pandemic, and further said that “the world needs to adopt a serious plan for developing, manufacturing, and distributing new vaccines to prevent another pandemic.” 

“One key is to take on the problem of vaccine hesitancy,” he added, in mulling how the world can improve vaccine uptake in third-world countries.

Gates, who’s also poured hundreds of millions of dollars into media outlets all over the world, was covered in a special report by Politico titled “How Bill Gates and partners used their clout to control the global Covid response — with little oversight.”

3. Digital passports

The prospect of a digital global vaccine passport system determined by an unelected organization seems out of a dystopian novel, but the reality is it’s close and highly possible.   

In fact, the WHO recently partnered with the European Union to create a globalized digital vaccine passport system for all future pandemics. 

The development happened within a year after the White House, on behalf of all G20 countries, declared support for the WHO to facilitate universal vaccine passports, which would include digital proof of vaccinations.

While the WHO may not have an intention to monitor people’s movements through digital passports, they were last year given the greenlight to restrict them.

On a podcast released last year, psychologist Dr. Jordan Peterson, who’s spent much of his life studying the apparent ease with which humans can become genocidal maniacs, said he’s concerned about the possibility of Canada and other western countries getting digital IDs like China uses.

Under the CCP’s thumb, technological surveillance is practically everywhere in the country, and it’s so intelligent that it can catch citizens for jaywalking. 

Subsequently, “The digital ID system has you,” Peterson said.

“It has your blood, now. It has your genetic code. It has your photograph. It can identify how you walk so even if it can’t see a face you can be picked up by gait,” he added.

“I think it would bring in – and has already in China – I think it’ll bring in a totalitarian tyranny so one hundred complete that it would make George Orwell’s 1984 look like a picnic,” Peterson said.

4. The WHO could have the power to censor dissent on social media

In May 2023, a WHO White Paper advocating for expanding WHO powers through the Pandemic Treaty put tackling COVID “misinformation” at the top of their list.

Under the guise of “Community protection,” the WHO wrote, “Infodemic of COVID-19 misinformation – often combined with ineffective and inconsistent risk communication and public health messaging – eroded public trust in public health authorities and science and undermined the effectiveness of public health and social measures and the demand for countermeasures such as vaccines.”

They went on to propose “New techniques for infodemic management.” 

The WHO stated that social media companies should continue doing what they did throughout the pandemic: censor people and media organizations who go against the mainstream narrative.

5. Disease X 

The WHO has been calling for member states to finalize the conditions of their pandemic treaty — and pitch in more money for “when the next pandemic strikes.”

To this end, Director-General Ghebreyesus shared a stage on January 17 with WEF Executive Committee member, Shyam Bishen, at a forum titled “Preparing for Disease X.”

Curiously, the WHO is leveraging the non-existent virus dubbed ‘Disease X’ to convince governments to finalize the Pandemic Treaty. 

According to the event description, “There are fresh warnings from the World Health Organization that an unknown ‘Disease X’ could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic.”

“What novel efforts are needed to prepare healthcare systems for the multiple challenges ahead?” the description asks.