BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Trudeau’s C-69 Illegal, Alberta Victorious

In a landmark decision, Canada’s Supreme Court has ruled against one of Justin Trudeau’s keystone environmental laws. The court found that Bill C-69, known as the Impact Assessment Act, is largely unconstitutional, dealing a blow to federal efforts to regulate Alberta’s oil and gas projects.

BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules Trudeau’s C-69 Illegal, Alberta Victorious

The Supreme Court had been tasked with determining whether the Impact Assessment Act and its regulations exceeded Parliament’s legislative authority under the Constitution. The Act establishes a complex two-part regulatory scheme. One part sets up an impact assessment process for federal projects, and the second part designates which projects are automatically subject to federal review.

Many accused the Trudeau Government of designing the act specifically impede Alberta’s oil and gas sector.

Last year, Alberta’s government referred two constitutional questions about Trudeau’s scheme to the Alberta Court of Appeal. The Alberta Court found the Act and its regulations to be unconstitutional in their entirety.

The Attorney General of Canada appealed this decision to the Supreme Court. Unlike the federal government, provincial governments must first direct their questions to their courts of appeal, but these can then be appealed to the Supreme Court without requiring permission.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal only in part. While sections 81 to 91 of the Act were found to be constitutional, the majority of the scheme was deemed unconstitutional.

Chief Justice Wagner, writing for the majority, stated that the scheme is unconstitutional in part for two overarching reasons. First, it does not focus on regulating “effects within federal jurisdiction” as defined in the Act. Second, the term “effects within federal jurisdiction” does not align with federal legislative jurisdiction.

“[Environmental protection remains one of today’s most pressing challenges. However,] Parliament also has the duty, however, to act within the enduring division of powers framework laid out in the Constitution,” Chief Justice Wagner wrote.

Remarkably, nine out of ten provinces are opposed to the federal government’s Bill C-69.

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre opposes Bill C-69. Last year, he pledged to abolish the bill and eliminate overseas oil imports within five years.

Share this story

Donate now to keep us on the front lines:

Help Keep your News Free

It's crucial we stay in touch

Big Tech wants to censor us, that’s why you need to stay in touch.

[wpp limit=6 order_by='views']

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE THESE...

Trending News

Here are the top 10 reasons why Calgarians should consider someone other than Jyoti Gondek to run their city.

Keean Bexte

November 29, 2024

Trending News

Smith won’t waste time with Trudeau, announces plan to patrol Alberta-Montana border.

Keean Bexte

November 28, 2024

Trending News

“Premier @ABDanielleSmith and I are leading Alberta into a future where our transportation network is modern, reliable, and works for all,” Dreeshen stated.  

TCS Wire

November 23, 2024

Trending News

Over the past two years, twenty (20) individuals in Canada have been arrested over ISIS-related charges. 

Mike Campbell

November 18, 2024

Trending News

Another poll reveals that the majority of Canadians want Justin Trudeau to step down before the next election.

TCS Wire

November 18, 2024

Want to join the conversation?

Sign up now to be able to like, comment and reply to other members. A full membership to our site includes:

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.