Buckle up. Because while the World Economic Forum’s Agenda sounds like a conspiracy theory, it’s an open, concrete, well-documented plan being actively worked on by some of the most influential people on the planet.
“You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.”
This message from the WEF has spread so far that even apolitical people have heard it uttered or seen the WEF’s advertisement — which was subsequently taken down but survived on archives and Twitter.
While many are concerned with the Great Reset — which will be examined shortly — in actuality, the Great Reset primarily serves as an opportunistic means of utilizing an ongoing series of crises (whether manufactured or organic) to transition humanity into the Fourth Industrial Revolution. As such, we’ll start with ends then examine the means.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution
“Of the many diverse and fascinating challenges we face today, the most intense and important is how to understand and shape the new technology revolution, which entails nothing less than a transformation of humankind.”
Professor and WEF founder Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution
According to the WEF website, the Fourth Industrial Revolution “is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.”
More specifically, it involves creating the infrastructure and technology for the Internet of Things (IoT) and Internet of Bodies (IoB). Proponents of this Revolution seek to create a system in which everyday appliances and even human bodies become manipulatable, data-generating nodes in a complex cybernetic nexus overseen by and integrated into overarching Artificial Intelligence networks through “data intermediaries” that are controlled by technocrats, central banks, increasingly centralized governments, megacorporations, international organizations such as the WEF, UN, WHO, and various NGOs.
Central to the Fourth Industrial Revolution is the creation of a global Digital ID, microchip implants, gene editing, designer babies, evermore intrusive smart devices, mRNA gene therapy for a rapidly expanding list of diseases, bionanotechnology, Artificial Intelligence and machine learning, and Elon Musk’s Neuralink. The latter is described as “ultra-high bandwidth brain-machine interfaces to connect humans and computers,” while other implanted microchips will be used to interact with the Internet of Things.
Do you want to board a plane, enter a restaurant, or even open your fridge? ‘Scan your chip, please. And don’t mind the data you just unknowingly provided us on your real-life behaviour.’
“The fourth industrial revolution is not only changing what we do but also who we are. The impact it will have on us as individuals is manifold, affecting our identity and its many related facets – our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns… It will influence how we meet people and nurture relationships, the hierarchies upon which we depend, our health, and maybe sooner than we think, it could lead to forms of human augmentation that cause us to question the very nature of human existence…”
“For all the reasons already mentioned, we are at the threshold of a radical systemic change that requires human beings to adapt continuously. As a result, we may witness an increasing degree of polarization in the world, marked by those who embrace change versus those who resist it” (Schwab 92).
Many will have heard the maxim ‘the Internet isn’t written in pencil; it’s written in Ink.’ With the development of Neuralink, this will also be true of all your thoughts and impulses. They will not be wholly private: they will be digitized and remotely alterable in some instances. This means your thoughts can be logged, analyzed, and attributed to your real-time Digital ID (I’ll explain this later), which in turn will be integrated into a sort of World Brain, as once posited by science fiction writer H.G. Wells.
But this isn’t science fiction. On the contrary, Schwab believes such a system is not only possible but is achievable within decades, not centuries.
“What if there was a better way? What if you could outsource the decision-making fatigue to a trustworthy third party? What if you could pre-consent to your preferences…? What if technology allowed you to outsource your decision-making even further – to a digitally automated agent, potentially using artificial intelligence (AI), which could actively make those decisions for you… And what if there is no screen? Ambient data collection… is increasingly common,” reads an excerpt from a WEF document.
That’s a lot of ‘what ifs.’ But how do you go about convincing or coercing people into accepting the Revolution?
Indeed, according to Schwab, “… the world lacks a consistent, positive and common narrative that outlines the opportunities and challenges of the fourth industrial revolution, a narrative that is essential if we are to empower a diverse set of individuals and communities and avoid a popular backlash against the fundamental changes underway” (13).
The Great Reset
This brings us to the Great Reset.
“To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions,” writes Schwab in an article. “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism [emphasis added by me].”
According to Schwab, the “Great Reset agenda” has three main components:
- “The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes. To this end, governments should improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a “stakeholder economy”… Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes….”
- “The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability… Rather than using these funds… to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.”
- “The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges.”
These components sound benign. However, when you unpack the innocent-sounding language, the Great Reset involves several truly radical proposals. These proposals include replacing capitalism with global communism, implementing a universal basic income, the collusion of governments beholden to unelected globalists to ensure that corporations abide by tentative ESG metrics set by NGOs — consequently destroying most small businesses in the process — and fully transitioning humanity into the Fourth Industrial Revolution under the guise of healthcare.
As columnist Rupa Subramanya writes while discussing Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland’s attempt to destroy Canada on behalf of the WEF with “stakeholder capitalism”:
“Like its first cousin, “The Great Reset,” which bizarrely aims to bring in environmental considerations under the purview of central banks, the innocuous-sounding stakeholder capitalism is committed to destroying the foundations of Anglo-American free-market capitalism and replacing it with a system where governments and their cronies in Davos tell private businesses what they need to care about. The irony here is that all of those at Davos, including Freeland, got there because of the free market system and shareholder-driven capitalism, which they’re now bent on overthrowing in an unholy alliance of true believers and opportunists.”
“There’s no need to invent conspiracy theories. The attempt by global elites to subvert local democracy is fully on and in plain view.”
For everyday people, the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum’s Agenda entails having their rights stripped away, losing their capacity to secure a decent life for themselves (on their terms), becoming dependent on an invasive, hostile state, being subjected to constant monitoring and scrutiny by third parties working on behalf of the state and globalists, and abiding by anti-human environmental policies which will drastically reduce the quality of life for nearly every person on the planet.
And while the Great Reset is the brainchild of Klaus Schwab, it should be noted that the United Nations, as well as many other international organizations, are fully on board, with the UN recommending that red meat consumption be reduced to 14 grams (one bite) per day per person as part of their ESG goals and international dietary framework.
But how could such ESG goals be managed on an individual level? How could governments know when an individual citizen has consumed more than their pre-approved single bite of red meat, and how could they prevent it? This is where Digital IDs, digital currency, and Social Credit Scores come in.
Digital IDs
By utilizing a Digital ID, wherein all transactions, activities, consumption, movement, biometric data, everything you say, everything you write online, and possibly even one’s thoughts via Neuralink are logged and monitored, coupled with a digital currency tied to said ID, the means by which a ubiquitous Social Credit Score is implemented are already in place — a government actor just has to give the order.
Imagine a world where everyone has a personal, pre-approved weekly carbon impact score attached to a Digital ID needed to open their car door, which has become part of the IoT. If your carbon impact score is too high, the door doesn’t open. That’s what’s in store for humanity, and this type of conditional freedom and access to society and property (which will be owned by the state) will be applied to every facet of life.
Some may think this is unlikely, but if we look at the recent Freedom Convoy protests in Canada, it is clear that governments, particularly those that have been “penetrated” by the WEF and their Young Global Leaders, are more than willing to freeze the bank accounts and seize the cryptocurrency wallets of their supposed constituents when they get out of line. When all currency is digital, the effect of doing so will be maximized. Dissent will be met with instantaneous impoverishment — thus, fostering total compliance.
Moreover, while many think of China regarding Digital IDs and Social Credit Scores, Digital IDs have already come to the West in the form of vaccine passports, which the WEF states in no unclear terms.
“The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a heightened focus on the power of medical data, specifically so-called vaccine passports. These passports by nature serve as a form of digital identity,” a WEF document reads on page 24.
Indeed, following two years of acclimation to conditional rights and freedoms, the transition from vaccine passports to a formalized Digital ID is occurring in plain sight.
In Canada, the province of Ontario states their plan to extend aspects of the vaccine passport in the form of a Digital ID on their website.
According to Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission and WEF Agenda Contributor, “… the [European] Commission will propose a secure European e-identity. One that we trust and that any citizen can use anywhere in Europe to do anything from paying your taxes to renting a bicycle.”
She says “can use” not “will need to use” to pay your taxes, but don’t be surprised when the language changes.
Anyone who is not concerned with this development should be, for the implementation of a global Digital ID will mark the end of human freedom as we know it. The World Economic Forum’s Agenda must be opposed at all levels of society to secure the continued prosperity of our species.
