Here’s what may be in Smith’s Parental Rights policy tomorrow

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s impending legislation concerning parental rights is poised to make waves across Canada. 

Here’s what may be in Smith’s Parental Rights policy tomorrow

Set to be introduced on Wednesday, the legislation could emerge as one of the strongest in the country, addressing the contentious issue of who holds the rights over children’s gender identity expression in schools – the parents or the educators.

To date, the United Conservative Party staffers have remained tight-lipped about the proposed bill. 

It wouldn’t be surprising if Smith’s proposed legislation includes the issue of whether men who identify as women can participate in women’s sports, or if surgeries and treatments for minors under the banner of “gender-affirming care” are outright banned.

In anticipation of the legislation, the Alberta Teachers Association recently expressed frustration over not being consulted on the upcoming changes. This is very, very good news.

The Alberta Teacher’s Association’s opinions on which hormones should be administered to children is completely irrelevant. 

Premier Smith has already indicated she believes in having a strong emphasis on family involvement in educational decisions, particularly concerning personal and sensitive matters like gender identity.

At the UCP convention in November, Smith said “Parents are the primary caregivers and educators of their children.” Of all the issues discussed at the two-day event, this statement garnered the loudest applause from party delegates.

Alberta NDP members have quite predictably voiced their concerns over the pending bill, accusing Smith of potentially targeting vulnerable children. 

Moreover, the NDP’s federal counterpart recently said that “trans kids” are one of the most vulnerable groups in Canada and even promoted giving them quick access to puberty blockers. 

Of course, not everyone accepts the concept of “trans kids,” especially given the fact that most minors who believe they are in the wrong body later realize they were simply confused. 

Moreover, a recent study suggests that giving puberty blockers to “trans kids” may lower their IQ, along with several other negative effects — including making them sterile.

Another recent study revealed that transgender women (biological males) who take “gender-affirming” hormones face a 95% higher risk of heart disease and other cardiovascular conditions.

Conservative wave in Canada 

The upcoming legislation could also mirror similar policies in Saskatchewan, which have already faced backlash from LGBTQ+ advocates. These policies require parental consent for children under 16 to use different names or pronouns at school.

In October 2023, the Saskatchewan Party government introduced the “Parents’ Bill of Rights” in the provincial legislature, invoking the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Constitution to empower parents as the primary decision-makers in their children’s education.

Notably, the bill asserts that if a student is under 16 years of age, parental consent must be obtained before teachers and school employees use the pupil’s new gender-swapped name or gender identity at school. 

Moreover, the federal Conservatives made some significant changes to their constitution in September, including protecting female spaces and sports from biological men, and banning life altering medicinal or surgical interventions on minors under 18 to treat gender confusion or dysphoria.

Majority believe parents have a right to know

A July poll by Angus Reid shows that 86% of those surveyed believe parents have the right to know when their child wants to be identified with different pronouns. 

50% of parents believe parents have the right to know and must give consent to pronoun changes on their children. 

The Counter Signal will be the best place to find news on this subject tomorrow afternoon. Be sure to subscribe here to stay up to date.

This story is part of our opinion section. It is written with both objective fact and subjective perspective. Unlike the CBC, The Counter Signal believes it is important to distinguish between news and opinion.

Share this story

Donate now to keep us on the front lines:

Help Keep your News Free

It's crucial we stay in touch

Big Tech wants to censor us, that’s why you need to stay in touch.

[wpp limit=6 order_by='views']

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE THESE...

Trending News

According to several well placed sources, Danielle Smith’s United Conservative Party is making serious inroads in the unlikeliest of places: Edmonton.

Keean Bexte

December 6, 2024

Trending News

It’s unclear whether this is more embarrassing for the Government of Canada or for academia.

Mike Campbell

December 4, 2024

Trending News

Here are the top 10 reasons why Calgarians should consider someone other than Jyoti Gondek to run their city.

Keean Bexte

November 29, 2024

Trending News

Smith won’t waste time with Trudeau, announces plan to patrol Alberta-Montana border.

Keean Bexte

November 28, 2024

Trending News

“Premier @ABDanielleSmith and I are leading Alberta into a future where our transportation network is modern, reliable, and works for all,” Dreeshen stated.  

TCS Wire

November 23, 2024

Want to join the conversation?

Sign up now to be able to like, comment and reply to other members. A full membership to our site includes:

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.