A new peer-reviewed study suggests the natural immunity of an unvaccinated person offers more robust protection against re-infection than those who received the vaccine before being infected — and offers about the same level of protection as those with ‘hybrid’ immunity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98617/986175287e3ca32e17614c38732132b520ff382f" alt="Study suggests natural immunity is superior to vaccination"
Accounting for more than 5.7 million people in their study, researchers Goldberg, Yair, et al. concluded in The New England Journal of Medicine that:
“…Protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons.” [Emphasis added]
💥 peer-reviewed… https://t.co/822ijL9epd
— Kulvinder Kaur MD (@dockaurG) June 14, 2022
Natural Immunity wins again. New England Journal Study: Natural immunity “protection was higher than that conferred after the same time had elapsed since receipt of a second dose of vaccine among previously uninfected persons.” https://t.co/aEFHKfXQUi
— Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) June 12, 2022
The researchers compared infection rates among three groups: (1) previously infected, unvaccinated; (2) previously infected, vaccinated, and (3) vaccinated persons with no previous infection. This allowed them to “assess the level of protection afforded by hybrid immunity as compared with that afforded by natural immunity or immunity conferred by vaccination.”
The infection rate for the recovered, unvaccinated group – at 4 to 6 months after infection – is 10.5 per 100,000, which rises to 30.2 at 12 months.
Conversely, the infection rate for the uninfected, vaccinated group – from 4 to 6 months after vaccination – is 69 per 100,000. This is more than twice as high as the infection rate from group 1 in half the time.
Also, the ‘hybrid immunity’ group – meaning recovered and vaccinated – produced similar results as the unvaccinated, recovered group. Indeed, the difference is negligible at 4-6 months and 6-8 months post-infection.
Worth pointing out that Fig 3 is a bit deceiving at 1st glance. It makes "hybrid immunity" appear more protective against infection, but if you compare the same 4-<8 mos, 1 dose + recovered doesn't have sig fewer infections than recovered
— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) June 13, 2022
&data don't go out 4-8 mos for 3 doses! pic.twitter.com/VEgNi8XCuM
In other words, the so-called ‘hybrid protection,’ which experts said for months was ‘the best’ type of protection, looks no different than protection from natural immunity for unvaccinated persons.
With that said, waning immunity was found in all three cohorts.
This study verifies another previously covered by The Counter Signal that found that both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines offer no long-term protection against COVID-19, particularly with the Omicron variant.
Trudeau better get his fourth booster shot soon so he doesn’t get too sick when he catches covid for the fourth time! pic.twitter.com/pYgCD3wiVU
— Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) June 14, 2022
And to this point, Canada’s recent data dump reveals the boosted account for the majority of COVID deaths.